Mumbai based businessman is jailed for mistreating a female bank employee

 

A 54-year-old businessman was sentenced to a year of hard labor in a Mumbai magistrate's court for insulting the dignity of a female bank employee who had come to his home on business. The businessman was not only given a jail sentence, but the court also fined him Rs. 1000. When the female bank employee came to his house to verify, the businessman mistreated her. 

 Narendra Sagvekar, the defendant, is 54 years old. On November 27, 2020, the victim, a 27-year-old deputy manager at a bank, visited Sagvekar's home to confirm his address in connection with his application for a bank account.

A day prior, Sagvekar had gone to the bank to open a savings account, but he neglected to bring a photo. An employee was tasked with going to his home to confirm his address in accordance with bank policies. 

 Around 12:30 p.m., the woman arrived at the house and discovered Sagvekar by himself. She was going to depart after doing the necessary paperwork when Sagvekar allegedly used unlawful force, kissed her on the cheek and neck, held her hard, and made illegal physical contact. She was able to shove him away and left the scene right away.

Following her escape, the victim went back to her bank branch and told the operations head, branch manager, and a coworker about what had happened. She later complained to the Malad Police Station. Two days after being taken into custody on December 17, the accused was freed on bond. 

 The accused claimed that no witnesses were present at the scene of the crime and that the accusations were unfounded. However, even under cross-examination, Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate B.N. Chikne deemed the woman's statement to be reliable and consistent throughout the trial. Despite the lack of eyewitnesses, the court found that the victim's testimony was sufficient to convict the accused.

Next, a point was raised – Why the female employee took time to file FIR? Why was there delay in reaching to the police?

The magistrate said that panic and fear in such situations are natural, and it is common for Indian women to hesitate before taking such cases to the public eye. “The delay has been properly explained,” the judge said.

In an attempt to justify himself, Sagvekar said that the woman had made a fake complaint against him because he disagreed with a savings plan she recommended and failed to reply to her "Hello" WhatsApp message. 

 The court dismissed this argument, ruling that the claim lacked credibility and that the woman had no reason to falsely accuse him. In addition to refusing to release Sagvekar on probation or a bond of good behavior, the accused asked the court to release him on a bond of good behavior. The magistrate declared, "The accused does not deserve leniency because this is an offense of moral turpitude."