ED has arrested a Bank of India(BoI) officer in a fraud case for Rs 16.10 crore

In accordance with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), Hitesh Kumar Singla, an officer of Bank of India, was taken into custody by the Directorate of Enforcement (ED), Mumbai, from Ahmedabad Junction Railway Station. Bank of India had previously suspended the officer. 

 After his appearance before the Greater Bombay Special PMLA Court, he was given seven days of ED detention. Under Sections 13(1)(a) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, and Section 316(5) of the BNS, the CBI had brought a case against Singla and Others.

As the case involved money laundering, it was transferred to ED and ED started its investigation.

Investigations revealed that between May 2023 and July 2025, Singla fraudulently closed multiple accounts—including Term Deposits (TDs), Public Provident Fund (PPF), Senior Citizen Savings Scheme (SCSS), Savings Bank (SB), and Current Accounts (CA)—without authorization. The funds were then diverted to his personal SBI savings accounts.

According to the ED, Singla deliberately targeted 127 account holders, mostly vulnerable customers such as senior citizens, minors, deceased persons, and dormant account holders, to avoid detection.

The diverted funds were layered and transferred in small, concealed transactions, causing a total loss of ₹16.10 crore to Bank of India and its customers, while severely damaging the bank’s reputation and public trust.

Singla had been evading the bank and not reporting since the crime was discovered. At Ahmedabad Junction, ED apprehended him based on technical surveillance and intelligence inputs. He was detained despite his repeated attempts to avoid detection by switching carriages and seats on Train No. 19320 Mahamana Express (Ujjain–Veraval).

Read More

CBI Investigates ₹121 Crore Fraud in Gujarat, Complaint lodged by BOI

Three sites in Ahmedabad and Gandhinagar have been searched by the CBI in relation to a ₹121 crore bank scam involving the city-based company Anil Bioplus. Incriminating documents were seized as a result of the Wednesday raids. 

The CBI has charged the firm and its directors, Amol Shripal Sheth, Darshan Mehta, and Nalin Thakur, in response to a complaint filed by the Bank of India. 

 Based on a complaint received from Bank of India against M/s. Anil Bioplus Ltd., a private company based in Ahmedabad, its three directors—Amol Shripal Sheth, a full-time director; Darshan Mehta, a full-time director; and Nalin Thakur, a director—as well as unidentified public employees and other unidentified individuals, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) opened a case on September 8, 2025.

The lawsuit alleges that the directors of a private company situated in Ahmedabad conspired with unidentified Bank of India personnel with the malicious purpose to cause the bank to suffer an unjustified loss of Rs. 121.60 crores.

Read More

Big Fraud of Rs.1,396 Crore Fraud in Bank of India(BOI) and Other Banks

On August 30, 2025, the Shimla-based Directorate of Enforcement (ED) conducted search operations in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, as part of a large-scale bank fraud and money laundering case involving M/s Indian Technomac Company Ltd (M/s ITCOL). In addition to the business establishments of M/s Anmol Mines Pvt. Ltd. (AMPL) and M/s Anmol Resources Pvt. Ltd. (ARPL), the searches were carried out at the residence of Shakti Ranjan Dash, Managing Director of these companies. The action was carried out in accordance with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA), 2002.

The Himachal Pradesh Police CID filed a formal complaint (FIR) alleging that M/s ITCOL's directors conspired with corporate officials and chartered accountants to embezzle bank loans approved by a group of banks. According to ED findings, M/s ITCOL submitted fabricated project reports and displayed fictitious sales to dummy/shell firms in order to fraudulently obtain loans from a consortium managed by the Bank of India between 2009 and 2013. The loans were diverted elsewhere rather than being used for approved reasons. The estimated value of the suspected scam is ₹1,396 crore.

The ED had already seized assets totaling ₹310 crore in April 2025, of which ₹289 crore had been returned to the group of banks headed by Bank of India. According to the most recent inquiry, M/s ITCOL and its shell companies transferred ₹59.80 crore into M/s Anmol Mines Pvt. Ltd.'s (AMPL) bank accounts. The managing director of AMPL, Shakti Ranjan Dash, has been charged by the ED with willfully aiding Rakesh Kumar Sharma, the founder of M/s ITCOL, in money laundering by directing cash into mining operations in Odisha.

Investigators found that Shakti Ranjan Dash subsequently integrated the diverted money into AMPL’s accounts and recorded it as legitimate business income, thereby attempting to project “proceeds of crime” as clean money.

During the Bhubaneswar raids, the ED seized many luxury vehicles, cash,jewellery and property. Two lockers belonging to Dash were also frozen.

The ED confirmed that the seized assets belong to Shakti Ranjan Dash and his associated companies. Officials emphasized that the investigation is ongoing and further action will follow as evidence is scrutinized.

Read More

BOI Classifies Loan Account of Reliance Communications as ‘Fraud’

 

Reliance Communications Limited, its promoter and former director, Shri Anil Dhirajlal Ambani, and its former director, Smt. Manjari Ashok Kacker, have had their loan accounts classified as "fraud" by Bank of India.

The Bank of India has also decided to label the loan accounts of RTL (the company's subsidiary), Smt. Grace Thomas (the former director of RTL and current director of the company), and a few other individuals (named in the RTL Letter) as "fraud." This decision was communicated in a letter to Reliance Telecom Limited (RTL), a subsidiary of the company.

Bank of India approved a 700 crore rupee term loan. As of 07/08/2025, there were 724.78 crores that were still owed. The loan was approved to cover a short-term discrepancy brought on by investments made in the purchase of 3G spectrum and associated capital expenditures. There was no guarantee when the loan was approved.

On June 30, 2017, the borrower's account became non-performing, with Rs 724.78 crores still owed. Although the Bank has been pursuing the borrowers and guarantors to collect the debt, they have not fulfilled their obligations.

Through M/s BDO India LLP, the bank carried out a forensic audit after the account became non-performing. The appropriate authority was presented with the results of the forensic audit. The following observations, findings, and conclusions of the forensic audit have led the competent authority to conclude that there are suspected fraudulent connotations after reviewing the audit:

In accordance with the review letter, Bank of India paid RCOM INR 350.00 Crores in a letter dated October 3, 2016, for "ongoing Capital exp, operational expenditure, repayment of existing liabilities other than related party / shareholder loans."

Loan Diversion: Fixed deposits totaled INR 350.00 crores.

A loan of Rs. 350 Cr was raised by the BOI on March 27, 2015, to cover spectrum fees. MF held the loan amount until April 7, 2015.A loan of Rs. 310.00 Cr was raised by SCB on March 30, 2015. FD was made on April 7, 2015, for a total of Rs. 632.50 Cr (BOI Rs. 350 Cr + SCB Rs. 310 Cr). RCOM obtained an equivalent loan of Rs. 632.50 Cr from BOI in order to pay the DOT Government of India for the Spectrum fees in relation to the aforementioned FD.

FD was liquidated on June 11, 2015, and the Rs. 632.50 Cr BOl loan was paid back. The payment of operational expenses was made with the full amount of the BOI loan.

The sanction letter stated that using the loan funds to invest in fixed deposits was prohibited; therefore, this is regarded as non-compliance with sanction terms of the loan.

Borrower requested that the company is undergoing Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and thus the account should not be classified as Fraud.

Read More

In Loan Fraud Case, Female Branch manager of PSU Bank suspended in Uttar Pradesh

At the Punjab National Bank (PNB) branch in the Shernagar region, a significant fraud case has been discovered. A female bank manager assigned to the branch has been charged with defrauding the bank by abusing her position and using fictitious documentation to obtain a Rs 40 lakh home loan. 

 An internal investigation was started by the bank management as soon as the issue was discovered. The accused bank officer was immediately suspended from her position after it was confirmed that fraud had definitely occurred. 

 Additionally, the bank has accused her of fraud and breach of trust in a First Information Report (FIR) that was submitted to the police station. Police are currently pursuing legal action against her.

Shivansh Verma, the son of Shivkumar Verma, the manager of the same PNB Shernagar branch, filed a complaint. He complained about the old manager's financial theft at the New Mandi Kotwali police station. 

 His complaint states that from July 17, 2021, to May 2, 2023, Amrita Singh, the wife of Lokendra Singh and a native of Rampur village in the Kanpur Nagar area, served as the Branch Manager at PNB Shernagar. She currently resides in Gokul City, Muzaffarnagar, with her family.

How the Fraud Happened

Amrita Singh requested for a house loan from her own branch when she was the branch manager in order to purchase a plot in Dream City, a housing colony being built in Muzaffarnagar. She stated that the purpose of the loan was to purchase land and construct a home on it. 

 

A Rs 40 lakh home loan was authorized by the bank and credited to her personal account. Amrita Singh did purchase the land, but despite the passage of time, no construction has begun on the property. Additionally, it was discovered that she failed to provide crucial paperwork needed for the property's mortgage, which is a prerequisite for obtaining a house loan.

She obtained the entire sum of Rs 40 lakh by abusing her powerful position within the bank and skipping the required procedures. Amrita Singh did not begin construction or adhere to the bank's loan requirements despite multiple reminders from the bank. 

 The bank suspended her after an internal investigation determined that fraud had taken place. The bank subsequently filed an official complaint with the police.

Read More

Home Loan Fraud in Bank, Builder sold same Flat to multiple People

 In a noteworthy development, on July 4, 2025, Harsh Sharma was taken into custody by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) in relation to a housing loan fraud case that began on August 2, 2017. Since the case was initially filed, Harsh Sharma had not participated in the investigation and had been evading capture for eight years. In a protracted investigation, his arrest represents a significant advancement.

The CBI claims that Harsh Sharma and the construction company Shree Balaji Hitech Construction engaged in a criminal conspiracy. His personal information, including his KYC details, was exploited to fabricate home loan applications. He was fictitiously represented by the builder as the buyer of an apartment that never actually changed hands.

The identical apartment was purportedly sold to several phony purchasers in order to defraud Punjab National Bank of loan payments. Through fabricated documentation and fictitious transactions, this fraudulent behavior enabled the builder to unlawfully receive substantial quantities of money from the bank.

On March 19, 2024, the CBI submitted a charge sheet outlining the accused's role before the Special CBI Court in Ghaziabad. The court had issued a non-bailable warrant against Harsh Sharma because he was evading capture and refusing to cooperate with the inquiry. On the morning of July 4, 2025, the CBI team made the last arrest after persistently trying to track him down.

Harsh Sharma was brought before the Special Judicial Magistrate (CBI) in Ghaziabad after his arrest. He is currently being held in judicial detention until July 15, 2025, under the court's ruling. The CBI has said that the matter is still being investigated and that additional information may be revealed as it develops.

Read More

CBI arrests proclaimed offender in historical bank fraud case involving Rs 5.69 lakh at Bank of India(BOI)

Satish Kumar Anand, who was designated a Proclaimed Offender in a bank fraud case involving ₹5.69 lakh from Bank of India, has been taken into custody by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). The case began on May 5, 1978, when the CBI filed a complaint against three individuals:

1. The Branch Manager of a Bank of India branch
2. Satish Kumar Anand
3. Ashok Kumar

CBI alleged that the branch manager and Satish Kumar Anand worked together in a criminal conspiracy to cheat the bank.

• The bank manager, while working at the branch in 1977, sanctioned a loan to a private company.
• The loan was given based on fake receipts and false bills, showing goods had been sent out, when in reality, no such shipment took place.
• As a result, the bank lost ₹5.69 lakh, and this amount wrongfully benefited Satish Kumar Anand.

After investigating, CBI filed a chargesheet in the Special CBI Court in Dehradun.

• In 1985, the court convicted Satish Kumar Anand and Ashok Kumar, sentencing both to 5 years of rigorous imprisonment and a fine of ₹15,000.
• The bank manager was acquitted (found not guilty).

How Did Satish Kumar Anand Become a Proclaimed Offender?

After being convicted, Satish Kumar Anand disappeared and did not serve his jail sentence. The CBI Court in Dehradun, on 30 November 2009, officially declared him a Proclaimed Offender, which means he was legally marked as an absconder.

After years of being on the run, CBI arrested Satish Kumar Anand on 25th June 2025. He will now be presented before the Special CBI Court in Dehradun, where further legal action will be taken.

More details will be released soon.

Source -hellobanker.in

Read More

Case Filed Against 5 Bank Officers in Agra, Chief Manager Suspended

In a serious development, the Jagdishpura police station in Agra has registered a case against five Indian Bank officers after an investigation based on a complaint filed by a woman. The case includes charges of fraud, defamation, and violation of the Information Technology (IT) Act, along with provisions under the SC/ST Act.

What Is the Case About?

According to ACP Loha Mandi, Mayank Tiwari, the case was registered after instructions from the SC-ST Commission. The complaint was filed by Preeti Singh, a resident of Nilgiri Enclave, Albatia Road, Agra.

Preeti Singh’s husband, Vikrant Singh, previously served as the Chief Manager at Indian Bank’s Noida branch. He was suspended by the bank in connection with a corruption case. Following his suspension, Preeti Singh filed a complaint alleging that bank officials acted illegally to falsely strengthen the case against her husband.

Who Are the Accused?

The FIR names five Indian Bank officers who are posted in different locations:

• Vikay Arya
• Deshbandhu Gupta
• Archit Gupta
• Harsha Sahu
• Vishesh Kumar Srivastava

These officers are posted in Noida, Lucknow, and Chandigarh, as per the FIR.

What Are the Allegations?

Preeti Singh alleged that the bank officers illegally accessed private bank account information belonging to her and her minor daughters, without any official permission. She claims that these details were taken without proper communication or authorization from the banks where these accounts were held, including Canara Bank and the State Bank of India (SBI).

She also said that forged documents were prepared to make false claims, and that every effort was made to damage her social reputation. The accused bank officials allegedly attempted to show that her husband’s corruption charges were valid by misusing their power and accessing private information.

Police Action and Legal Process

ACP Mayank Tiwari confirmed that serious allegations were made against the Indian Bank officials. He stated that the woman had been filing repeated complaints, which eventually reached the SC-ST Commission. After a legal review, police registered the case under relevant sections of the SC/ST Act, fraud, defamation, and the Information Technology Act.

Read More