Bank Manager and Clerk Arrested in Rs.23 Lakh Fraud Case

 


A branch manager and a clerk from Indian Bank's Santhome branch in Chennai have been taken into custody by the Central Crime Branch's Bank Fraud Investigation Wing on suspicion of being involved in a significant fund theft case.

The police claim that Sathya Narayana, the regional manager of Indian Bank, lodged the complaint that led to the arrests. He accused P. Jayasingh, a clerk at the Santhome branch, and Sundar Mohan Maji, the branch manager, of grave financial malfeasance in his complaint to the City Police Commissioner.

Misuse of Customer Accounts

The complaint claims that by fraudulently taking money out of customer accounts, the two bank employees abused their positions. They allegedly obtained dormant accounts those that had not been used for a long period of time and falsified customer signatures to siphon off funds without the account holders’ knowledge.

Loans Taken Without Customers’ Knowledge

The officials also allegedly took out loans in the names of unsuspecting customers. These loans were then settled by pledging jewellery, possibly stolen or fraudulently acquired. In one instance, they are accused of swindling 146.5 grams of gold jewellery from a customer. The total loss caused by their fraudulent activities has been estimated at Rs.23 lakh, as per the bank’s internal findings.

Arrest and Legal Action

The Central Crime Branch investigated the case and arrested both Sundar Mohan Maji and P. Jayasingh. They were presented before the court and have been remanded to judicial custody as the investigation continues.

This case has raised serious concerns over internal monitoring and customer account security at banking institutions. Authorities have assured that strict action will be taken and all efforts are being made to recover the defrauded amount.

Share:

Rs 10 crore fraud in Bank of India(BOI), Senior Bank Officer Sent to Jail


Three people were sentenced to five years in prison by a special Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) court for defrauding Bank of India out of Rs.10.27 crore in a significant decision. In the case, which began in April 2012, a businessman, a senior bank official, and an intermediary forged paperwork in order to obtain credit from the bank without authorization.


The court also imposed severe financial penalties in addition to the jail sentence. The middleman received a fine of Rs.30 lakh, the banker Rs.15 lakh, and the businessman Rs.8 crore.


Case Registered in 2013 by CBI

The CBI’s Economic Offences Wing registered the case on February 2, 2013. Those named in the case included:

  • Nikhil Patt, a businessman
  • Damodar Kamath, then senior manager (credit) at Vijaya Bank
  • Sooraj Tayade, an agent
  • Four other accused, including two who are still absconding, one who passed away during the trial, and one who was acquitted due to lack of evidence.


How the Bank Fraud Happened

The complaint came from the Deputy Zonal Manager of Bank of India’s Mumbai North Zone. According to the investigation, the fraud was carried out using fake Letters of Credit (LCs) – financial instruments banks use to guarantee a buyer’s payment to a seller.

Kamath, the bank manager, issued four such fake LCs worth a total of Rs.10.27 crore. Here’s how the LCs were misused:

  • Two LCs worth Rs.7.25 crore were issued in the name of Madhav Trading Corporation, a company owned by Nikhil Patt.
  • One LC was issued to Siddhi Graphics, owned by Sameer Shah.
  • The fourth LC was in the name of Parmar Trading Corporation, owned by Chandrakant Desai.

Shah and Desai are still on the run.


Misuse of Funds

Once the fake LCs were processed, a Bank of India officer named T. Gopala verified and cleared them. The money was then credited to the accounts of the three companies involved.

However, the money was not used for any business purpose. Instead, it was transferred across different accounts and withdrawn in large amounts by the accused.

The investigation revealed that out of the Rs.10.27 crore:

  • Rs.1.02 crore was transferred from Madhav Trading Corporation to Suraj Kumar Trading, a company owned by Sooraj Tayade.
  • Another Rs.15 lakh was directly transferred to bank manager Kamath, suggesting his active role in the fraud.


This case is a serious example of how banking frauds can affect public financial institutions. The court’s decision sends a clear message: those who misuse their position and cheat the banking system for personal profit will face strict legal consequences.

Share:

PSU Bank filed CBI complaint in Rs.16 Crore Fraud case


 In a significant ₹16-crore bank fraud case involving Punjab Lightning Industries Limited, situated in Industrial Area, Phase 2, Mohali, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) has formally filed a chargesheet. The trial will start on June 4, 2025, at a special CBI court in Chandigarh. The case was first registered on June 27, 2024.


How the Bank Fraud Happened

According to the CBI’s chargesheet, the company’s directors Vinay Gupta and Urvashi Gupta had taken a loan of nearly ₹16 crore from Punjab National Bank (PNB). The loan was meant for the business’s working capital and commercial activities. However, instead of using the money for the business, they allegedly diverted the funds for personal use and to pay off loans of other companies owned by them.

What the Bank Discovered

The fraud came to light after the company stopped repaying the loan, which raised concerns at the bank. Punjab National Bank then conducted an internal investigation, which revealed shocking findings. During the audit of the company’s unit in Mohali, it was discovered that:

  • No production was going on at the factory.
  • There was no raw material or finished goods on site.
  • The factory had been shut down for several months.

Misuse of Loan for Buying Property

The audit further revealed that Vinay Gupta used part of the loan amount to buy a house in Sector 15-A, Chandigarh, and the property was registered under his son’s name. He also bought another property in Sector 11, which clearly indicated that the funds were not being used for the business, but rather for personal gains.

Legal Action and CBI Investigation

Following the internal audit, PNB filed a complaint with the CBI, as the evidence pointed toward intentional default by the company directors. After investigating the matter, the CBI charged them under:

  • Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) – for cheating.
  • Section 120-B of the IPC – for criminal conspiracy.
  • Relevant sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act.
Share:

The CBI opened a criminal probe into the Rs 12.08 crore Bank of India fraud

 


Five officials of a private construction company are the subject of a criminal probe by the Central Bureau of probe (CBI). These officers are charged with defrauding the Bank of India, resulting in a ₹12.08 crore loss. 



 The executives allegedly broke key terms of the loan arrangement and misappropriated the bank's loan funds, according to CBI sources. After a complaint was submitted by the deputy general manager of the Bank of India's Asset Recovery Management Branch in Andheri West, the case became public knowledge. The CBI began its investigation as a result.




The Bank of India claims that the construction firm and its directors defrauded the bank by not depositing the sale proceeds from flats and shops in its Navi Mumbai real estate projects, as required by the loan agreement. 




The bank’s complaint states that instead of following the terms, the firm sold the properties without obtaining the necessary No Objection Certificates (NOCs) from the bank, which is a key condition.




The CBI has filed the case under sections of the Indian Penal Code and the Prevention of Corruption Act. These charges include criminal conspiracy, cheating, misappropriation of funds, and diversion of funds. 




According to the complaint, the bank’s loss due to this fraud was estimated to be ₹12.08 crore, as of December 2021. The CBI will investigate the bank’s credit transactions with the firm from July 2013 to December 2021, which were used to finance the company’s construction projects in and around Navi Mumbai.




The bank claims that according to the loan’s terms, the construction firm was supposed to obtain NOCs from the bank before selling any of the flats or shops in their projects. Additionally, the sale proceeds were supposed to be deposited with the bank. However, the firm failed to comply with these conditions, as stated in the bank’s complaint.




Loan Account Classified as Non-Performing Asset




The firm’s loan account was marked as a non-performing asset (NPA) on March 31, 2016, following standard banking procedures. Later, a demand notice was issued under the SARFAESI (Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest) Act, 2002. The loan was also officially classified as “fraud” in September 2024 by the Competent Authority, in line with a Supreme Court ruling from 2023.




The CBI’s investigation is continuing as it looks into the full extent of the financial wrongdoing and the involved officials’ roles in the matter.

Share:

Gold Loan Fraud of Rs.1.65 crore in Bank: Female Officer Fired


An assistant manager at the Rajim branch of Indian Overseas Bank was arrested for stealing more than Rs 1 crore through the issuance of fraudulent jewelry loans. Ankita Panigrahi, the accused, was apprehended from Bargarh, Odisha, by the State Economic Offenses Investigation Bureau (EOW). The police started questioning her and pursuing additional legal action after the arrest.


Ankita Panigrahi was employed in 2022 as an Assistant Manager at Indian Overseas Bank's Rajim branch in the Gariaband district. She created fictitious jewelry loan records there by abusing locked bank accounts. She was able to take out Rs 1 crore 65 lakh from the bank in fraud by doing this.


When this fraud was discovered, the bank fired her right away. The Economic Offenses Wing (EOW) then formally filed a case against her in 2023. The case was brought under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code, which addresses criminal breach of trust by a public worker, and Section 13(a) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (as amended in 2018).


For a long time, Ankita had been absconding (hiding from the authorities), but the EOW finally tracked her down in Bargarh, Odisha. She was taken into police custody (remand) so that officials could question her thoroughly about the fraud. The EOW is now conducting a detailed investigation to uncover the full extent of the scam and to check whether other people were involved.

Share:

Indian banks win bankruptcy appeal in Vijay Mallya case in UK


An key legal action against Vijay Mallya, the former owner of Kingfisher Airlines, has been won in London by a group of Indian banks, led by the State Bank of India (SBI). The case concerned Mallya's recovery of a sizable debt following the failure of his airline. Options for home loans


Anthony Mann, a judge at the London High Court, made the announcement on Wednesday. The bankruptcy ruling against Vijay Mallya is still in effect as a result of his decision in favor of the Indian banks. For the banks, this is a significant step in recovering their funds.


What Is the Case About?

Following a decision by the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) in India, Indian banks sued Mallya in the UK back in 2017.  Due to Mallya's personal guarantee for Kingfisher Airlines' loans, the DRT has ordered him to repay more than GBP 1.12 billion, or around Rs 11,000 crore.

 In the United Kingdom, the banks filed for bankruptcy against Mallya in 2018.  Mallya attempted to halt it by claiming that the banks had security on his assets and that he had previously offered enough assets in India that had been confiscated by the Enforcement Directorate(ED).


What Happened in the Court?

A UK court ruled in 2020 that the banks did have security over Mallya's assets, which partially invalidated the bankruptcy petition.  However, the banks appealed that decision, and they were granted permission to do so in 2021.  Additionally, they amended their bankruptcy petition to state that they would relinquish any claim to Mallya's Indian assets in the event that he was found bankrupt.

 Mallya resisted this modification, claiming it violated Indian law and public policy.  However, the UK court ruled in April 2021 that the modification was lawful and did not violate any Indian regulations.


Now, in the latest ruling, the High Court has:

  • Allowed the banks’ appeal that they do not hold security on Mallya’s assets
  • Rejected Mallya’s attempt to challenge the bankruptcy order
  • Said the bankruptcy order against Mallya stands firm


What the Banks’ Lawyers Said

The law firm TLT LLP, which represents the banks, said this decision is very important. It proves that the banks were right to file the bankruptcy case and that the assets taken by the ED in India don’t cancel the debt under English law.
Nick Curling, legal director at TLT, said, “This is a big win for the banks. We have been working on this case since 2017.”


What Vijay Mallya’s Side Says

Mallya, who filed for bankruptcy in July 2021, is currently pursuing a different legal path. He has applied to the UK court to have the bankruptcy judgment revoked, claiming that the assets in India were sufficient to cover the banks' payments.

Mallya will keep fighting, according to his attorney Leigh Crestohl, who has also filed a separate petition in India's Karnataka High Court. He requests that the banks provide a detailed report on their recovery efforts.

Meanwhile, Mallya is still out on bail in the UK. He is also involved in a private legal matter, which is believed to be related to his asylum request in the UK. This is separate from his extradition case to India, where he is wanted on charges of fraud and money laundering.
Share:

ED arrests Samajwadi Party leader in Rs.750 Crore Bank Fraud Case with 7 banks led by BOI


 Vinay Shankar Tiwari, a prominent Samajwadi Party (SP) leader and the son of the late powerful politician Hari Shankar Tiwari, was taken into custody by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) on Monday in relation to a huge bank fraud case worth ₹750 crore. Following several raids by ED teams at several properties connected to him and his business, Gangotri Enterprises Ltd., he was arrested from Lucknow. 


 The arrest is a component of a broader probe into financial irregularities by Vinay Shankar Tiwari and his family's business, Gangotri Enterprises. Gangotri Enterprises obtained loans totaling ₹1,129.44 crore from a consortium of seven banks, led by the Bank of India, according to ED sources. Nevertheless, around ₹750 crore of this sum was not repaid.


The Enforcement Directorate has alleged that the company diverted and misused the loan amount, violating banking norms and causing a huge loss to the banks. The money was allegedly siphoned off for personal and unauthorized purposes, leading to a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).


ED teams searched ten separate locations in India connected to Tiwari and his company on the day of the arrest. Five locations in Lucknow, two in Noida and Gorakhpur, and one each in Delhi and Mumbai were among them. Involving almost a dozen teams, the action began early in the morning. 


 Several significant documents, including those pertaining to properties valued at crores of rupees, were found during the raids. According to ED personnel, substantial evidence of financial misconduct was discovered within a few hours of the search operation.


Despite receiving several summons from the Enforcement Directorate, Vinay Shankar Tiwari reportedly failed to appear before investigators. This non-cooperation further raised suspicion and led to intensified action. Meanwhile, the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) had already registered a case against Gangotri Enterprises and its promoters based on complaints from the banks involved.


The ED took over the case under money laundering charges after the CBI’s FIR. So far, the ED has seized property worth about ₹100 crore in connection with this fraud.


One prominent character in Uttar Pradesh politics is Vinay Shankar Tiwari. In the past, he served as the representative for Gorakhpur's Chillupar constituency, which had been occupied by his father. Prior to joining the Samajwadi Party, he was elected as an MLA on a ticket from the Bahujan Samaj Party (BSP). He did not, however, win the 2022 Assembly election. 


According to reports, the ED is getting ready to submit a formal chargesheet against him because his business and political background is currently being investigated. Political circles have been rocked by this arrest, and as the ED looks into the assets and financial transactions connected to Gangotri Enterprises, the inquiry is likely to go even more extensive.

Share:

BOI Chief Manager sent to 3 Years Jail in Loan Fraud Case


For his role in a bank fraud case, Jeevangine Srinivasa Rao (J.S. Rao), the former chief manager of Bank of India's SM Road Branch in Ahmedabad, was convicted to three years in prison and fined ₹1.5 lakh by a special CBI court in Ahmedabad. 


On October 30, 2003, J.S. Rao and others were the subject of a case filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI). 


According to the Prevention of Corruption Act, the lawsuit was founded on claims of criminal conspiracy, fraud, forgery of valuable security, and criminal misconduct. 


The CBI claims that in order to obtain a loan, private participants in the conspiracy provided fictitious collateral security.


According to the investigation, J.S. Rao used dishonest methods to approve a loan of ₹80 lakh for private individuals. 


Among the loans were: 

As working capital, 

₹30 lakh A Letter of Credit (LC) for ₹25 lakh As a term loan, 

₹25 lakh These loans were made using fake and falsified collateral security, 

which caused the bank to suffer an unjustified loss and the accused to profit illegally.


 Additionally, the CBI discovered that Rao failed to properly investigate the business operations of the private entity both before and after the sanction. 

Even though he was aware that the company had previously provided fictitious collateral security, he nevertheless approved more phony paperwork, including as an equitable mortgage for a Gandhinagar plot.

Share:

  Useful links for Bankers
   * Latest DA Updates
   * How to recover Bad loans/NPA Acs
   * Latest 12th BPS Updates
   * Atal Pension Yojana (APY)
   * Tips while taking charge as Manager
   * Software used by Banks in India
   * Finacle Menus, Shortcuts & Commands
   * Balance Inquiry Number of all Banks
   * PSU & Private Banks Quarterly result
   * Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY)

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *