Nation-wide strike impacts banking services at PSU banks

Banking operations, including cash withdrawal and cheque clearance, were hit due to two-day nationwide strike by employee unions of public sector banks to press for wage revision.

The strike call has been given by the United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU), an umbrella body of nine bank unions, including All India Bank Officers' Confederation (AIBOC), All India Bank Employees Association (AIBEA) and National Organisation of Bank Workers (NOBW) to press for wage revision pending since November 2017.

However, private sector lenders like ICICI Bank and HDFC Bank ran operations as usual.

Branches in several parts of the country remained closed and some of the ATMs also went dry, according to reports coming various parts of the country.

Many banks, including State Bank of India (SBI), had informed customers in advance that operations may be impacted to some extent due to the strike.

The strike coincided with the beginning of the Budget session of Parliament and presentation of Union Budget 2020-21.

The UFBU decided to go on strike after its discussion with Indian Banks Association (IBA) on wage revision failed in the recent round of negotiations held on Thursday.

During discussions, the IBA on Thursday improved their offer to 12.5 per cent, but this was not acceptable, the unions said.

"The bank managements and IBA did not come forward to settle the demands with a reasonable increase in salary looking to inflation and heavy workload on the employees," the UFBU said.

However, the IBA in a statement said despite the revised offer of up to 19 per cent hike, including performance linked incentive, made by it during the meeting on Thursday, the unions decided to go ahead with the all-India bank strike.

Wage revision for employees of public sector banks is pending since November 2017.

In the past wage settlement, which was for the period November 1, 2012, to October 31, 2017, employees got a hike of 15 per cent.

The IBA also rejected the unions demand for five-day banking saying, "It is known to all that the economy of the country is going through testing times. Banks being the principal players in economic development, cannot afford to provide lesser number of working days for banking activities."

The banking lobby said the country already has one of the highest numbers of public holidays and adding 26 more holidays would create more problems for the public.

"IBA is claiming five-day banking is not possible due to the tough economic situation in the country. Then how RBI, Department of Financial Services (DFS), NCLT, Central Vigilance Commission (CVC) and other central and state departments are working for five days in a week? Are these institutions not worried about the economic slowdown?" asked a section of agitating bankers.

Read More

AIBEA Wants PMC Bank to be Merged with any Public Sector Bank

                                  

Though the 11th Bipartite Wage revision of the Public Sector Banks are still pending for more than two years with the reason of higher Non performing assets (NPA), the employees union of the Public Sector Bank, All India Employees Association (AIBEA) geenral secretary has requested the finance minister to merge the defunct Punjab & Maharashtra Co-operative Bank with a Public sector Bank and lift the ban on withdrawal limit.

He said " it is necessary to lift the present ban and order the takeover of this Bank by a Public Sector Bank (PSB). We strongly feel that the City Co-Operative Urban Bank is a fit case for being merged with a Public sector Bank and its present licence should be cancelled forthwith.

Mr Venkatachalam also appealed to Finance Minister Ms Sitharaman to merge all Co-op Banks into PSU banks to avoid loot of deposits in the hands of political leaders who normally control them and convert the deposits into bad loans and put the depositors in dire financial stress when RBI applies the brakes through Audit and Inspection Department (AID) by applying 35 A restrictions, Make RBI accountable as single window to all depositors in Indian Union rather than dual reporting to RBI and Registrar of Co-op Societies in case of Co-op banks and in the bargain having no accountability with both washing off their responsibilities.

I don't know what to say about AIBEA approach but I believe that at this moment the much needed work is to settle the long pending salary of the bank employees and it is to remind the AIBEA leadership that there are more employees and their dependents suffering due to non settlement of the 11th bipartite as compare to PMC bank. First to look after the hunger of our own house than others.

Source - bipartitesettlement.com

Read More

Strike call on 22nd Oct by AIBEA & BEFI - Circular

Read More

Suggestions given by AIBEA to the Finance Minister

The rate of interest on savings bank deposits needs to be revised upwards by at least 2 per cent and interest on fixed deposits should be exempted from the purview of income tax, according to suggestions made by the All India Bank Employees’ Association(AIBEA) to the Finance Minister.

The association said banks should extend agriculture loan at the rate of 2 per cent per annum. Further, they should extend education loan at concessional rate of interest of 5 per cent to the poorer sections, with interest subvention.

Since non-performing assets of the banks have risen phenomenally, the Government should institute more Debt Recovery Tribunals and Fast Track Courts to recover the bad loans.

“The Reserve Bank of India should publish the list of defaulters, who owe the banks more than Rs. 1 crore. This defaulters list should be published every six months with updates.

“Section 45 of the RBI Act should be suitably amended to provide powers to RBI to publish the name of any defaulter in public interest,” said CH Venkatachalam, General Secretary, AIBEA.

Venkatachalam emphasised that bank loan defaulters should be prohibited from contesting in any of the elections to local body or Legislative Assembly or Parliament or to hold any public office of profit. Any such person, who holds such position at present should be made to relinquish their positions, he added.

The association alleged that the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) is facilitating the corporate defaulters to get away easily as the banks are forced to bear enormous “write-off” of bad loans in the name of “hair-cuts”.

“IBC favours resolution of bad loans instead of recovery. Hence, recovery mechanism should be strengthened instead of resolution process. To facilitate recovery, recovery laws should be enacted/amended to confiscate the personal assets of the Directors in case of default by a company, in which they are directors,” the Association said.

The AIBEA said banks should be advised to institute a separate vertical, headed by a General Manager, for recovery in “Prudentially Written Off/ Technically Written Off” accounts. The details of such recovery should be placed before the boards of the Banks and submitted to the Ministry of Finance on a quarterly basis.

“A system must be evolved to ensure accountability and responsibility on the part of the Managing Directors & CEOs/Executive Directors and other executives of the public sector banks in respect of sanction of credit, which which tun into NPA within one year (quick mortality cases),” said Venkatachalam.

Read More

AIBEA Circular on UFBU-IBA Meeting on 21st Feb for 11th Bipartite Settlement

Read More

Crack within UFBU may affect wage revision talks

A major crack has surfaced between bank officers and workmen unions over the issue of wage settlement, threatening to hamper the 11th bipartite negotiation. 

The United Forum of Bank Unions (UFBU) -- the umbrella body of nine trade unions -- which holds wage revision talks on the behalf of their members with the Indian Banks' Association (IBA), is even facing a split if the matter is not resolved fast. The two of the officers organisations abstained from the negotiation table in the last round of talks. 

The fight erupted between UFBU members following an IBA proposal of bank-wise wage settlement for senior officers from scale IV and above. Six banks -- State Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Indian Bank, Oriental Bank of Commerce, Punjab National Bank and Union Bank of India -- have mandated IBA to restrict the wage rise offer to officers up to scale III. These banks proposed to fix compensation for their senior officers independent of the bipartite negotiation, and based on their paying capacity. 

In other words, these banks with better financials than the rest have shown willingness to offer higher remuneration package to their officers -- from chief managers to general managers. 

The 21 public sector banks employ over 10 lakh people. About 3.5 lakh are officers with about 60-65% of them being from these six banks. However, about 90% of the officers in all banks taken together fall in the scale I to scale III category. 

Protesting against the split mandate to IBA, the All India Bank Officers Confederation (AIBOC) -- the largest officers’ organization -- abstained from the last negotiation talks held on February 2 in Mumbai. At that meeting where two other bank officers unions were present, IBA raised its wage increase proposal to 10% from the previous 8% offer. AIBOC had walked out of the negotiation table on November 30 as well. 

“We want expeditious settlement of wages. We have appealed AIBOC leadership to return to the negotiation table,” AIBEA president Rajen Nagar told ET on Thursday. 

“If AIBOC does not return to the table, then workmen need to take a view of the situation. We cannot wait indefinitely,” Nagar said. 

Earlier, AIBOC criticized AIBEA general secretary CH Venkatachalam for reportedly inciting a split within UFBU. 

“He (Venkatachalam) has stated that the present offer of IBA is more in quantitative terms than the quantum paid in the 10th bipartite settlement. He has also said the officers’ associations are creating impediment to the settlement. We strongly denounce unilateral pronouncement of one constituent of UFBU on the merit of the present offer of IBA which is very likely to jeopardize the ongoing negotiation,” AIBOC general secretary Soumya Datta had said last Saturday. 

"We seek your immediate intervention at this critical juncture so that the edifice of joint movement do not suffer," Datta said in a letter to UFBU. 

National Organisation of Bank Officers (NOBO) also did not take part at the February 2 meeting while All Indian All India Bank Officers Association (AIBOA) and Indian National Bank Officers Congress (INBOC) were present. 

“His (Venkatachalam’s) statement has been distorted. He has only narrated the truth at a union meeting in Kanpur,” AIBEA’s Nagar said. “The fact remains that we have rejected IBA’s 10% offer,” he said. 

The 11th bipartite settlement is due from November 1, 2017.  

Read More

AIBEA circular on UFBU Bipartite Settlement talks with IBA on 2nd Feb

 

Read More

150 million Indians to go on strike against Modi’s “anti-labour” policies

Daily life across India might come to a screeching halt as nearly 150 million employees across banks, public transport, factories, and government companies go on a two-day strike from tomorrow (Jan. 08).

The strike has been called by 10 trade unions across the country against what they believe are anti-labour policies of prime minister Narendra Modi’s government. Employees from the power, steel, auto, and financial services sector will participate in this “historic event.”

The strike will also be joined by farmers, who have been protesting against the agrarian crisis in the country for several months now.

“The government has been pursuing anti-economic and anti-labour policies which has forced us to go on this strike,” CH Venkatachalam, general secretary of the All India Banks Employees’ Association (AIBEA), one of the trade unions that is participating in the protest, told Quartz. “For instance, prices of commodities have been going up and even the essential goods are not available in fair price shops and the government doesn’t seem to be doing anything about it.”

Founded in 1946, AIBEA is India’s oldest and largest bank employees’ union with around 500,000 members.

Another reason for the protest is the fact that India is not creating enough jobs. Ahead of the last general elections, Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) had promised to create nearly 10 million jobs every year. Despite these tall claims, the employment scenario in the country is so dismal that in the last financial year the total number of employees in India came down, instead of going up.

Another sore point for the trade unions is that a large number of public sector companies are struggling, forcing the government to divest its stake in them or merge them with healthier ones. For instance, in November 2018, the cabinet approved the stake sale of government-owned Dredging Corporation of India to a consortium of four ports.

“The public sector companies have a lion’s share in the economy and therefore steps must be taken to strengthen them instead of privatising them as it may lead to various problems,” Venkatachalam said.

This is the second time in less than a fortnight that bank employees are going on a strike against bank mergers. In September last year, the government had announced the merger of Dena Bank with Vijaya Bank and Bank of Baroda (BOB), which will come into effect from April 01, 2019. Last month, nearly a million bank employees had observed a one-day strike against the merger. However, soon after the last strike, the cabinet approved the merger proving the strike to be futile.

In a filing to the stock exchanges, many banks have already said that the strikes this week may impact their services. “In the event of AIBEA and BEFI proceeding on strike on January 8-9, 2019, the functioning of bank’s branches/offices in some of the zones may be affected,” BOB informed the exchanges on Jan. 05.

This is a situation that has played out in India several times where it has been proven that strikes yield very little results apart from inconveniencing the general public.

Read More