In a serious development, the Jagdishpura police station in Agra has registered a case against five Indian Bank officers after an investigation based on a complaint filed by a woman. The case includes charges of fraud, defamation, and violation of the Information Technology (IT) Act, along with provisions under the SC/ST Act.
What Is the Case About?
According to ACP Loha Mandi, Mayank Tiwari, the case was registered after instructions from the SC-ST Commission. The complaint was filed by Preeti Singh, a resident of Nilgiri Enclave, Albatia Road, Agra.
Preeti Singh’s husband, Vikrant Singh, previously served as the Chief Manager at Indian Bank’s Noida branch. He was suspended by the bank in connection with a corruption case. Following his suspension, Preeti Singh filed a complaint alleging that bank officials acted illegally to falsely strengthen the case against her husband.
Who Are the Accused?
The FIR names five Indian Bank officers who are posted in different locations:
- Vikay Arya
- Deshbandhu Gupta
- Archit Gupta
- Harsha Sahu
- Vishesh Kumar Srivastava
These officers are posted in Noida, Lucknow, and Chandigarh, as per the FIR.
What Are the Allegations?
Preeti Singh alleged that the bank officers illegally accessed private bank account information belonging to her and her minor daughters, without any official permission. She claims that these details were taken without proper communication or authorization from the banks where these accounts were held, including Canara Bank and the State Bank of India (SBI).
She also said that forged documents were prepared to make false claims, and that every effort was made to damage her social reputation. The accused bank officials allegedly attempted to show that her husband’s corruption charges were valid by misusing their power and accessing private information.
Police Action and Legal Process
ACP Mayank Tiwari confirmed that serious allegations were made against the Indian Bank officials. He stated that the woman had been filing repeated complaints, which eventually reached the SC-ST Commission. After a legal review, police registered the case under relevant sections of the SC/ST Act, fraud, defamation, and the Information Technology Act.