Government's bank recapitalisation plan actually working?



Public sector banks (PSBs) have played a pioneering role in developing India's industries, but recent evidence suggests they are being shortchanged. Large infrastructure projects have been bogged down by legacy issues, regulatory overreach, and negligence on the part of banks, which has only led to the pile of bad debt becoming bigger.
The rise in the level of non-performing assets (NPAs) has consequently led to more public money being injected into government banks to meet capital requirements. Provisioning for bad loans has impacted their profitability and growth. Private banks have been relatively more successful than their state-run counterparts in leveraging market forces to raise capital.
The gross NPA ratio of scheduled commercials banks rose from 10.2 percent at the end of September 2017, to 11.6 percent at the end of March 2018. Private banks fared much better during the period under review with an NPA ratio of only 4 percent; PSBs gross NPA ratio at the end of the period was 15.6 percent.
The government had formulated the 'Indradhanush' plan in August 2015 to resolve the issues faced by PSBs, and make them more competitive vis-à-vis private banks. The seven-pronged action plan to revamp PSBs identified both structural and policy issues that were holding back these institutions from living up to their mandate.
On the structural side, governance issues, NPAs, and a homogenous credit base have held back state-run banks. The Indradhanush plan estimated that recapitalisation to the tune of Rs 1.8 lakh crore was needed to nurse these banks back to health.


This amount was to be released in a staggered manner, spread over four years. Of the total, Rs 70,000 crore would be infused into banks by the government, while the remaining Rs 1,10,000 crore would have to be raised by banks. The government has already injected Rs 59,435 crore of the total in public banks, with the residual amount to be raised through budgetary provisions.

In January 2018, the government mooted a front-loaded bank capitalisation plan of Rs 2.11 lakh crore to augment the Indradhanush plan. Of the total, Rs 1.35 lakh crore was to be infused through sale of recapitalisation bonds, while the rest would come from budgetary provisioning and through funds raised from the market.
Public banks have been the beneficiaries of government aid, especially since the market liberalisation reforms of 1991. Union budgets presented in the last five years have earmarked money for bank capitalisation, of which Rs 83,504 crore has been spent. However, the budgetary provision for FY18 was Rs 90,000 crore, much more than the expense incurred over the last five years.


The diversion of public funds for keeping state-owned banks afloat is indicative of the systemic flaws that have culminated in mounting bad debt and over-leveraged balance sheets. Institutions like Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) have also been used as surrogates to stave off crisis in these banks.
The quantum of direct government support to the banking sector has increased by over 450 percent over the last four fiscal years, from Rs 15,504 crore in FY14 to Rs 86,510 crore in FY18. For the current financial year, Bank of India received the most government aid, having received at Rs 9,232 crore. It was followed by State Bank of India (SBI), which received Rs 8,800 crore.


The capital infusion by the government is broadly in line with the net losses reported by state-run banks. Of all the PSBs in the country, only Indian Bank and Vijaya Bank recorded profits in FY18. Cases of financial fraud, most notably, the one orchestrated by Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi, pulled down the performance of Punjab National Bank, which recorded a loss of Rs 12,283 crore, the highest among PSBs. In FY18, SBI and its associates received Rs 8,800 crore in cash from the government, while recording a loss of Rs 5,339 crore for the year.

Of the 21 public banks in operation, 19 reported losses this year, resulting in numerous calls for their privatisation.

Despite the government having increased its allocation for recapitalisation of these banks by a not-so-modest amount, they are still being found wanting. Their gross NPA ratios have swelled in the recent past, with IDBI Bank reporting a GNPA ratio of 27.95 percent at the end of the June quarter, up from 24.11 percent as at the end of the same quarter last year.
The same is true in the case of United Bank of India, whose GNPA ratio rose by almost 7 percentage points over the past year. PNB's bad loans also spiked, with GNPA ratio increasing to 18.38 percent of its asset base.
Factoring in possible losses from restructured assets and additional provisioning, it would be safe to assume that more money will be need to be pumped in to ensure that public banks meet capital adequacy norms.

Source- Moneycontrol
Share:

Punjab National Bank(PNB) posts smaller-than-expected net loss for Q1; asset quality improves QoQ


Fraud-hit Punjab National Bank (PNB) reported a loss of ₹ 940 crore in the June quarter of 2018-19 (Q1 FY19) against a profit of ₹ 343 crore in the year-ago period. The bank managed to improve on its performance compared to the immediate preceding quarter as it recovered a substantial portion of its non-performing assets (NPAs).

PNB’s gross NPAs were at 18.26% in Q1 as against 13.66% in the year-ago period and 18.38% in the preceding quarter. Net NPAs were at 10.58% in the June quarter as against 8.67% in the year-ago period and 11.24% in the preceding quarter. Provisioning for NPAs was at ₹ 4,981 crore as against ₹ 2,559 crore in the year-ago period and ₹ 16,202 crore in the last quarter.

The bank had reported a record loss of ₹ 13,417 crore in the fourth quarter of 2017-18 on account of provisioning for NPAs due to tighter loan classification norms by the Reserve Bank of India, PNB fraud-related payouts to other banks as well as losses in the bond portfolio.


PNB, the fourth-biggest bank by assets among all of India’s lenders, in February said it had been defrauded by jewellers Nirav Modi and Mehul Choksi, who raised more than $2 billion credit overseas using fake letters of undertaking (LoUs) provided by the bank’s staff at its Brady House branch in Mumbai.

Share:

Dhanlaxmi Bank reports net loss in Q1 as bad loans rise



Private sector Dhanlaxmi Bank today reported a net loss of Rs 45 crore in the first quarter ended June 2018. The bank had registered a net profit of Rs 7.97 crore in the corresponding April-June quarter a year ago. The losses widened against preceding March quarter's Rs 17.16 crore.
Total income during the said quarter was down at Rs 256.36 crore from Rs 287.25 crore a year ago, the bank said in a regulatory filing. The core income from interest was also down at Rs 239.92 crore in three months to June from Rs 259.30 crore year in April-June of 2017-18.

Bank's gross bad loans as a proportion of gross loans by end-June 2018 spiked to 8.94 percent (Rs 531.05 crore), compared to 5.62 percent (Rs 354.13 crore) as on June 30, 2017.
Net NPAs were at 3.79 percent (Rs 212.84 crore), up from 3.15 percent (Rs 193.12 crore). Provisions an contingencies increased to Rs 65.01 crore in the quarter, as against Rs 18.66 crore in same period year earlier. Provision coverage ratio was at 79.45 percent as on June 30, 2018.
Share:

Syndicate Bank Q1 net loss widens nearly 5 times, NPAs soar



State-owned Syndicate Bank today said its net losses have widened to Rs 1,281.77 crore during first quarter ended June of the current fiscal as bad loans rose. 

Its loss in the corresponding April-June period of 2017-18 was at Rs 263.19 crore. Its income also fell to Rs 5,637.51 crore during the June quarter of 2018-19, as against Rs 6,171.49 crore a year ago. 

The bank said in a regulatory filing that its interest income fell to Rs 5,257.19 crore, from Rs 5,484.13 crore. Besides, there was significant fall in interest earned on balances with RBI and other inter bank funds. 


The asset quality was dented further to 12.59 per cent of the gross non-performing assets (NPAs) or bad loans as on June 30, 2018 from 9.96 per cent a year ago. 


It was 11.53 per cent in the preceding quarter ended March. Net NPAs too worsened to 6.64 per cent, from 6.27 per cent as on June 30, 2017 and 6.28 per cent by end March this year. In value terms, the gross NPAs stood at Rs 26,361.52 crore at June 30 this year, as against Rs 20,183.85 crore a year ago. 

Net NPAs were at Rs 13,010.80 crore vis-a-vis Rs 12,188.30 crore."Based on legal opinion given by an independent expert, pending issuance of final NCLAT order, an amount of Rs 100.86 crore recovered in an NPA account is considered as eligible credit for the calculation of NPA provision," Syndicate Bank said in the filing. 

Due to rise in portion of bad loans, the bank parked aside a higher provisioning amount for NPAs at Rs 1,774.11 crore in June quarter, as against Rs 1,385.66 crore a year ago. Overall provisioning and contingencies were at Rs 2,326.82 crore, up from Rs 1,333.88 crore. 
Share:

Dena Bank Q1 loss widens as provisions double



Despite lower bad loans,  government-owned Dena Bank's first quarter FY19 net loss widened five-fold year-on-year (YoY) to Rs 721.71 crore from  Rs 132.65 crore.
The loss grew on the back of higher provisions towards bad loans. The bank had a massive net loss of Rs 1,225.42 crore in the January to March quarter of FY18.
Provisions and contingencies more than doubled to Rs 1,118.75 crore in Q1 this year from Rs 522.48 crore in June quarter last year. Provisions towards non-performing assets (NPAs) rose to Rs 1,244 crore YoY from Rs 435 crore. Sequentially, provisions reduced from Rs 1,991 crore in the March quarter.
NPAs
During the quarter, gross NPAs reduced in absolute terms but deteriorated as a percentage of total loans due to a limited expansion in credit growth.
Gross NPA ratio as a percentage of total loans worsened to 22.69 percent from 22.04 percent in March end 2018 and 17.37 percent in June quarter last year.
However, in absolute terms, gross NPAs declined to Rs 15,866 crore from Rs 16361 crore in the March quarter and increased from Rs 12,994 crore as on June quarter last year.
Net NPA ratio improved to 11.04 percent from 11.95 percent as on March end and 11.22 percent as on June end 2017.

NII and Other income
NII or net interest income (the difference between interest earned and expended) grew to Rs 742.74 crore, up 10 percent from Rs 675.05 crore a year ago.
Non-interest income or other income dropped 32 percent to Rs 161.39 crore in June end 2018 from Rs 237.29 crore in June end 2017.
Capital
Signalling weakness in financial strength, the state-owned bank's capital adequacy ratio (CAR) declined to 10.60 percent as on June end 2018 from 11.09 percent as on March 2018 and 11.65 percent as on June end 2017.
Share:

Indian Bank Recruitment for Probationary Officers (PO) Posts 2018



Indian Bank has published Advertisement for below mentioned Posts 2018. Other details like age limit, educational qualification, selection process, application fee and how to apply are given below.


Indian Bank is inviting online applications from young and bright graduates who fulfill the eligibility criteria specified and who are interested in Banking career, for admission to the one year Post Graduate Diploma in Banking and Finance (PGDBF) course at Indian Bank Manipal School of Banking (IBMSB), which has been set up jointly by Indian Bank and Manipal Global Education Service Pvt Ltd.

Candidates will be selected through a selection process consisting of Online Exam (Preliminary & Main Examination) followed by Personal Interview. Admission to PGDBF at Indian Bank Manipal School of Banking (IBMSB) comes with the assurance of a full-fledged Banking career with Indian Bank as a Probationary Officer on successful completion of the course.

Posts: Probationary Officers

Name of the Course: Post Graduate Diploma in Banking and Finance (PGDBF)

Category wise:
SC - 62
ST - 31
OBC - 112
General - 212

Total No. of Posts: 417 Posts

Educational Qualification: A Degree (Graduation) in any discipline from a recognized University (or) any Equivalent qualification recognized as such by the Central Government
.
Age Limit: Minimum: 20 Years, Maximum: 30 Years

Application Fee :
Rs. 100/- for SC / ST / PWD Candidates
Rs. 600/- for all others

How to Apply: Interested Candidates may Apply Online Through official Website.


Important Dates:

  • Starting Date of Online Application: 1st August 2018
  • Last Date to Apply Online: 27th August 2018
  • Download of Call Letters for Online Exam (Prelims) : After 24th September 2018
  • Date of Online Exam (Preliminary) : 6th October 2018
  • Result of Online Exam (Preliminary) : 17th October 2018
  • Download of Call Letters for Online Exam (Mains) : 22nd October 2018
  • Date of Online Exam (Mains) : 4th November 2018

Apply Online: Click Here

Advertisement :

Click on right corner of PDF to view large
Share:

Two Bank of Baroda officials held for Rs 17.5 crore fraud



The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) arrested two employees of the Bank of Baroda (BoB) in connection with a fraud amounting to Rs 17.5crore that took place at the Diwada Colony branch of the bank in Mahisagar district. The employees were remanded to four days in CBI custody on Thursday. 

Those arrested include special assistant Manmohan Singh Meena and joint manager of the branch Satish Kumar Bhaskar. Police suspect involvement of others in he fraud. 

The CBI’s anti-corruption bureau (ACB) at Gandhinagar had registered an offence regarding the fraud on July 23 after a complaint dated July 5 from assistant general manager and regional head of the Godhra region Vivek Shukla. The irregularities had come to light during an internal audit by the bank following which the complaint was filed after suspending three officials, 

The internal audit was conducted after a special assistant Manmohan Singh Meena was transferred from the Diwada Colony branch on February 28. It had come to light that large amount of overdraft balance had remained unadjusted for a considerably long time in a New Inter-branch Settlement Account. 

On inquiring about this, it came to light that there were several suspicious entries that were created by Meena and verified by joint manager of the branch Satish Kumar Bhaskar. These entries were made in the bank’s office accounts, government accounts and accounts of various customers. 



Officials in the bank said that large sums were debited from the bank’s office accounts and government accounts. These were then deposited into other accounts to swindle money. Fraudulent credits were made into the accounts of the Kadana taluka development officer (TDO) and the amounts were transferred from the TDO’s accounts to those of others. The money was eventually withdrawn from a series of accounts.



Interestingly, those whose accounts were credited fraudulently did not raise a complaint or and the money was also withdrawn and used. The bank sees this as a connivance of the account holders in the scam.

The complaint moved by the bank mentions Meena and Bhaskar as the prime accused. Sources said that the CBI investigations could lead to other accused in the case. The bank had also suspended the branch manager Lakhana Oraon after the fraud came to light, but his role in the matter is being investigated.

When contacted, Shukla said that the CBI had informed them about the arrest of the accused. “The entire staff of the branch was transferred after the fraud came to light. We cannot disclose more in wake of the ongoing investigations,” said Shukla. 
Share:

RBI to strengthen banks' internal ombudsman: Can you hope for faster grievance redressal?



Going forward, bank customers can hope to get quicker arbitration from the Internal Ombudsman (IO) set up by the bank as the RBI plans to strengthen these ombudsmen and also make them more independent. 

In the Statement on Developmental and Regulatory Policies issued on August 1, 2018, RBI stated that it has been decided to enhance the independence of the IO while simultaneously strengthening the monitoring system over functioning of the IO mechanism. 

The revised instructions in this regard will be issued by the end of September 2018. 

Customer complaints in the banking system are increasing. Even though the banks have their own grievance redressal system in place including an Internal Ombudsman (IO), the customers often feel that their complaints remain largely unresolved and then have to approach the external ombudsman. 

In May 2015, with a view to strengthening the internal grievance redressal mechanism of banks, select banks were advised to appoint Internal Ombudsman (IO) as the apex authority for redressal of customer complaints. The intention of the Internal Ombudsman of the Bank is to strengthen the grievance redressal mechanism and to reduce the complaints being escalated to Banking Ombudsman. 


The Internal Ombudsman (Chief Customer Service Officer) is appointed by the Bank with objective of enabling customers of the Bank to access an independent arbitrator for their complaints , when they are not satisfied with the resolution provided by the Bank. The presence of an IO further strengthens the internal Grievance Redressal mechanism of the Bank. 


Procedure for approaching Internal Ombudsman

The customer before making a complaint to IO should make a representation to the Bank. In case the customer is not satisfied with the reply given by the Bank or the Bank has rejected the complaint or the Bank has failed to respond within a month of the representation, the customer can approach/appeal to IO. The IO shall ensure that as far as possible, the grievances are settled through internal redressal mechanism. 


What if Internal Ombudsman doesn't help

In case the customer is not satisfied, the customer can approach the Banking Ombudsman (appointed by Reserve Bank of India) of the relevant jurisdiction if the IO fails to respond within a month of the representation or if the customer is not satisfied with the resolution given by the IO. 

Source - Economic times
Share:

  Useful links for Bankers
   * Latest DA Updates
   * How to recover Bad loans/NPA Acs
   * Latest 12th BPS Updates
   * Atal Pension Yojana (APY)
   * Tips while taking charge as Manager
   * Software used by Banks in India
   * Finacle Menus, Shortcuts & Commands
   * Balance Inquiry Number of all Banks
   * PSU & Private Banks Quarterly result
   * Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana (PMAY)

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *